Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Central Tax Vs Toyota Kirloskar Motors (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Karnataka High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commissioner of Central Tax Vs Toyota Kirloskar Motors (Karnataka High Court)
Conclusion: Since Toyota was an output service provider therefore, it can utilise cenvat credit for payment of service tax on output services.
Held: The respondent – M/s Toyota Kirloskar Motors claimed to be manufactures of Multiutility Vehicles (MUV) for passenger cars and parts thereof falling under chapter sub-heading 8703.23.10 and 8708.10.90 respectively of the Central Excise Tariff and they were registered under the Central Excise and Service Tax. Respondent – assessee had received intellectual property ser...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

