In present facts of the case, it was observed that discontinuance of housing scheme would not disentitle the right of the Consumer to make claim on the project which was allotted initially.
In present facts of the case, it was held that the power of National Commission to review under section 21 of the Act is limited to cases where some prima facie error appears in the impugned order and where two interpretations of evidence are possible, concurrent findings based on evidence must be accepted and such findings cannot be substituted in revisional jurisdiction.
In present facts of the case, it was held that the Consumer was entitled to get his claim covered under the sub clause of the Insurance Policy which provides him a higher benefit.
In present facts of the case, demand of Custom duty was dropped as Bill of Entries were in the name of some different entities but the penalties were confirmed as the Appellant were actively involved in import of the goods and undervalued the same.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal set aside Notice under Section 148 by making observation that the ld. Assessing Officer failed to pinpoint the failure at the end of the assessee to disclose all material facts fully and truly, which led the escapement of income from taxation.
In present facts of the case, it was held that the services rendered were in the nature of advisory services as per the terms of the agreement, therefore these services cannot be the part of Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 13 of India – UK DTAA.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal while deducting the additions made by Ld. AO for repair and maintenance, it was observed that if the replacement is of a baby part only, then the same cannot be considered to be a capital expenditure.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court granted refund to the petitioner along with Interest from year 1988 for the cash which was seized without any corroboration and the said cash was also duly reflected in Income Tax Returns.
In present facts of the case, the Honble Supreme Court observed that the statute enacted by Parliament or a State Legislature cannot be declared unconstitutional lightly. Further, it was held that that nullification of mandamus by an enactment would be impermissible legislative exercise.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court observed that Section 35FF of the Excise Act indicates that interest would commence from the date of the order of the Appellate Authority as distinct from the making of an application which is prescribed to be the starting point insofar as Section 11BB of the Act is concerned.
