In present facts of the case, the matter was remanded and it was observed that the order of this Court dismissing the appeal cannot be read as a precedent and applied to the cases in hand. In fact, precedents cannot decide questions of fact.
In present facts of the case, it was observed by the Tribunal that only Assessee could sign Form number 35A prescribed under Income Tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) Rules, 2009.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court observed that writ under Article 226 would be maintainable if the Order has been passed beyond the Show Cause Notice as the action of an authority is wholly without jurisdiction and contrary to the principles of natural justice and in such case the Petitioners should not be relegated to an alternative remedy.
In present facts of the case, the Tribunal held that Assessment Order issued without DIN is null and void as it is in violation of CBDT Circular No. 19/2019 dated 1 4th August, 2019.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that when in a Conveyance deed the arrangement of re-purchase was provided then the said agreement cannot be treated as a Mortgage Agreement unless the condition is embodied in the document which effects or purports to effect the sale.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Judgment of High Court, wherein adequate compensation was provided on Land Acquisition while considering the relevant factors such as determining the deduction for development charges, the nature of land, area under acquisition, whether the land is developed or not, if developed to what extent, and the purpose of acquisition.
In present facts of the case, it was observed that an application under Order IX Rule 13 of Civil Procedure Code for setting aside exparte decree would be maintainable as evidence of the defendants was not even started and the defendants’ counsel had not even cross-examined the plaintiff’s evidence.
In present facts of the case, the Honble Supreme Court have given directions to the Central Information Commission and the State Information Commissions to ensure proper implementation of the mandate of Section 4 of the RTI Act,
In present facts of the case, the Honble High Court while dismissing the Petition have observed that the order passed in Appeal which has not been challenged by the Petitioner would attain finality, and therefore no fault can be found with the learned Tribunal seeking to enforce the Award in accordance with the law.
In present facts of the case, the Appeals were dismissed by Honble Supreme Court and have affirmed the Order of the Arbitral Tribunal wherein de-canalisation order by the Government was not communicated within time.
