IRDA (ISSUANCE OF CAPITAL BY GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANIES) REGULATIONS, 2013 NOTIFICATION F. NO. IRDA/REG./12/70/2013, DATED 16-2-2013 In exercise of powers conferred under section 14 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999 (41 of 1999), read with sections 6AA and 114A of the Insurance Act, 1938, the Authority, in consultation with the Insurance Advisory […]
The Govt. has extended the following incentives and promotional measures for the promotion of food processing sector: 1. Income Tax Relief a) Under sub-section (11A) of section 80 IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 a deduction from profits up to specified amounts [100% for the first 5 assessment years and thereafter, 25%(30% in the […]
CA NIraj Mahajan The day before the result. Unexpectedly I was calm, was with friends..had fund with them and saw a nice move in cinema hall.. came night, and the butterflies started waking up.. telling me how can you possibly sleep? Still, somehow passing time on whatsapp and FB, somehow convinced my eyes to droop.. […]
The date of implementation of the obligations under Regulations 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10 shall be from the date following six calendar months from the date of publication of these Regulations in the official gazette.
The federal government is sending each of us a $600 rebate. If we spend that money at Wal-Mart, the money goes to China. If we spend it on gasoline it goes to the Arabs. If we buy a computer it will go to India. If we purchase fruit and vegetables it will go to Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala.
The CBI today arrested an Additional Commissioner of Income Tax in Gandhinagar for allegedly demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs 30 lakh from a construction firm for favouring it in scrutiny of tax returns.
In earlier years, India was a highly regulated economy. To set-up an industry various licenses and registration under various enactments were required. The scope and mode of corporate restructuring was, therefore, very limited due to restrictive government policies and rigid regulatory framework.
The gist of the above averments is that the concerned person dealing with the matter in the appellant’s office received the orders and kept the same with him and forgot to hand it over to the appellant. The identity of “the concerned person dealing with the matter is not forthcoming. The appellant is a corporate entity and hence the concerned person dealing with the matter must be an employee of the company.
The second objection of the department is that the appellant do not satisfy the conditions no. 2(e) of 12/05 ST regarding non-availment of cenvat credit. The appellant’s plea from the very beginning has been that they have never availed cenvat credit either in respect of inputs or input services and that they have been claiming filing only the rebate in respect of input/input services from time to time and that in the ST-3 Return for October 2010 – March, 2011 the rebate claim had been mentioned as cenvat credit availed by mistake.
By virtue of Rule 22A of Part I KSR, which rules have been formulated by the State Government in exercise of the power under Article 309 of the Constitution of India, it is obligatory on the part of any State Government employee to have applied for and obtained coverage in respect of life, by subscribing to a Policy, in the official branch of the State Life Insurance and shall continue to subscribe the same till he ceased from the ‘service’. The said provision itself makes it clear that there is a reciprocal statutory duty upon the State Insurance Department, to provide Policy to such State Government employees and this statutory obligation cannot be stated as a ‘taxable service’ provided to any individual or establishment or class of such persons.
