Sponsored
    Follow Us:

DVAT 51 reconciliation return Qtr 1 to 4 of 2011-12 extended to 27/05/2013

May 9, 2013 732 Views 0 comment Print

Central Sales tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules 1957, for furnishing of the portion marked ‘original’ of the Declaration Forms ‘C’, ‘E-I’ or ‘E-II’, ‘F’, ‘I’, ‘J’, and ‘H’ respectively, as per the following time schedule for the year 2011-12:-

Classification of Filters referred to as “Disposable Sterilized Dialyzer” and “Microbarrier” for filtering blood” – regarding

May 9, 2013 2809 Views 0 comment Print

Doubts have been raised regarding classification of the filters referred to as Disposable Sterilized Dialyzer and Microbarrier: for filtering blood, whether under heading 9018, in tariff item 90189031 which provides for renal dialysis equipment (artificial kidneys, kidney machines and dialysers)

No Penalty on Gift of Resurgent India Bonds from Non Relative NRI

May 9, 2013 891 Views 0 comment Print

On the other hand, the ld. Senior DR relied on the orders of the lower authorities and contended that theory of gift was having a fundamental flaw in so far as there was absolutely no explanation as to why the alleged donor has given gift to the assessee.

Public Notice No. 12 (RE-2013)/2009-2014, Dated: 08.05.2013

May 8, 2013 391 Views 0 comment Print

The details of existing PSIA at Sl.No.30 in Appendix-5 of Handbook of Procedures (Vol – I) as notified in Public Notice No.52 dated 28.3.2013 are amended / corrected to read as under

SEBI : Notification regarding establishment of Local Office of Board at Patna

May 8, 2013 436 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 3 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Board has established its Local Office at Patna under the administrative control of its Eastern Regional Office at Kolkata.

TP- Comparability of High End Cos with Low End Cos in ITES/ BPO Sector

May 8, 2013 1257 Views 0 comment Print

We also note that even in the case of comparables selected by the assessee details of which have been given in para 3 of the order earlier, there is wide fluctuation in the margins of the companies; the lowest margin i.e. 0.34% in case of Ask Me Info Hub Ltd. and the highest margin as 27.98% in case of Allsec Technologies Ltd. Obviously the cases selected by the assessee are not identical otherwise there would not have been so wide variation Excluding the highest margin and the loss case, the average margin of other comparables of the assessee comes to only 4.5% which is 1/6th of the highest margin.

Regarding Exemption of SAD on imports of brass scrap

May 8, 2013 579 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of

Information A taxpayer can view in Form 26AS

May 8, 2013 8023 Views 0 comment Print

It is general phenomena amongst the tax payers that in form 26AS they can only view the details of TDS deducted, Advance tax and Self Assessment tax Paid.But in addition to these a taxpaer can view in 26AS the information on his income tax Refund and his transaction in Mutual Fund, Shares and Bonds, Immovable […]

Service tax Changes on Construction of complex, building, civil structure

May 8, 2013 13224 Views 0 comment Print

(a) for a residential unit satisfying both the following conditions, namely:– (i) the carpet area of the unit is less than 2000 square feet; and (ii) the amount charged for the unit is less than rupees one crore; (b) for other than the (a) above.

HC dismisses petition of CA alleging harassment by ITAT Members

May 8, 2013 2423 Views 0 comment Print

It is also pointed out that the Tribunal is delaying the matters of the petitioner or passing unreasoned orders or by totalling ignoring him. It is also pointed out that respondent No.2 was transferred out of Amritsar on a representation submitted by the petitioner but after one year respondent No.2 has been again posted as a Judicial Member of Amritsar Tribunal. The petitioner claims that the Members are totally prejudice against the petitioner on account of his having made a complaint against respondent No.2 to the President.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031