CS Amey A Patwardhan Quarterly Compliances for listed Companies for the Quarter Ended Q4- Jan‘15 to Mar’15 Sl. No. Compliances / Filings Last Date 1 Shareholding Pattern- to be submitted to BSE / NSE- both physically & electronically – through NEAPS within 21 days of end of quarter. (Clause 35 of Listing Agreement) 21-April […]
The undersigned is directed to say that guidelines for power generation, transmission and distribution in Special Economic Zones issued vide this Ministry’s letter of even number dated 21st March, 2012 stand withdrawn with immediate effect i.e 1st April, 2015.
The Companies Act, 2013 (the Act or New Act) brought in many changes which directly impact preparation of financial statements and require understanding of the new definitions and provisions. Earlier, The Company act 1956 didn’t include cash flow statement in the Definition of Financial statement.
With the introduction of concept of One Person Company (hereinafter OPC) in Companies Act, 2013 individuals doing business as sole proprietors will now be able to avail the benefits of limited liability without a second person to form a company.
Further, in terms of the circular dated April 22, 2014, it was advised that utilisation of export advances, received on the strength of guarantees issued by Indian banks, for repayment of loans availed of from Indian banks (except in cases where banks have received
We have been receiving representations from banks that, in the case of projects which have been stalled primarily due to inadequacies of the current promoters, a change in ownership/management may be required to revive the project. However, the new promoters/developers may require additional time to revive/complete the stalled projects.
Contention of the Assessee- Provision of Sec. 40(a)(ia) shall apply only in respect of the amounts payable at the end of the year and shall not apply on the amounts actually paid by the appellant during the year.
The following disallowances were made by the AO by invoking provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act: – 1 Disallowance on account of transportation charges paid to M/s. Lalji Mulji – Rs. 1 ,59,386/- 2 Disallowance on account of export freight charges paid – Rs. 6, 17,830/ – 3 Disallowance on account of export freight paid to Indian agents of foreign shipping companies – Rs. 3,70,062/-
In this case ITAT Mumbai distinguished the Allahabad High Court’s ruling in the case of CIT v. Vector Shipping Services (P) Ltd. (ITA No.122 of 2013) and held that the issue of ‘paid and payable’ was not subject of reference before the Allahabad High Court.
It is not the case of the Revenue that the assessee had not incurred the expenditure claimed or that the claim of expenditure was bogus or incorrect. The disallowance of expenditure was attracted due to non-deduction of TDS and it cannot be said to be a case of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.