Directors Imprisoned/penalized under Companies Act, 1956 Penalty on Directors of Companies Press Release dated 24-07-2015 Information pertaining to imprisonment/penalization of directors of companies having turnover of more than Rs 50 crore annually, in the year 2014-15 is as under:
In exercise of the powers conferred under Rule 49A of the Delhi Value Added Tax Rules, 2005, I, Vijay Kumar, Commissioner, Value Added Tax, do hereby extend the last date of filing of online/hard copy of first quarter return for the year 2015-16, in Form DVAT-16 , DVAT-17 and DVAT-48 along with required annexure/enclosures to 04/08/2015.
Central Board of Direct Taxes vide order under section 119 of the Income-tax Act F.No.225/154/ 2015/ETA-II dated 10.6.2015 has extended the ‘due date’ for filing Return of Income for assessment year 2015-16 in respect of assessees falling under clause (c) of explanation 2 to sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act from 31.7.2015 to 31.8.2015, In view of the same, the ‘due date’ for filing Retain of wealth by such assessees for assessment year 2015-16 also stands extended from 31 st July 2015 to 31 st August 2015.
CA Sumit Grover In Sep’13, Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of L&T held that the construction activity by builders pertaining to sale of flats prior to completion certificate are also subject to levy of VAT. The said verdict opened a Pandora Box regarding valuation for the periods prior to the date of judgment. To resolve […]
In the case of M/s. Majestic Exports vs. JCIT, ITAT Chennai held that the loss in the transactions of the forex derivatives contracts will be considered to be the business loss and the same can be set off against the business income.
Notification No. 60/2015 – Income Tax S.O. (E) – In exercise of the powers conferred by clause(v) of the Explanation to section 48 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the
In the case of Commissioner of Customs v Kamalabhai, Madras High Court held that the exported goods u/s 113 can’t be confiscated but the penalties in section 114 related to “Attempt to make exports” will be applied as Attempt is a step to actual export.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 and sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Additional Commissioner of Customs(Port-Import)
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 and sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Joint/Additional Commissioner of Customs, Inland
Indian Judicial system is partly legacy of the British Rule in India. The best thing which the Britishers gave to this country is the judicial system. The basic feature of the administration of justice is adversary system of trial. Both the parties place their cases before the court and the Judge sits only as an umpire and does not play any investigative role. Therefore, the judiciary consists of both Bench and Bar and the latter plays an important role in entire system.
