CESTAT held that amount collected by selling study material is not a taxable service, hence, no service tax leviable on sale of coaching material.
AAR ruled that purchasing second hand gold in form of jewellery / parts of jewellery, from unregistered individuals and selling to registered / unregistered dealers, after melting in form of lumps / irregular shapes of gold will not get benefit of chargeability of GST on the margin difference between the sale price and purchase price as stipulated in Rule 32(5) of CGST Rules 2017
AAR ruled that since assessee was providing accommodation to pilgrims outside boundary of temple and rooms rent charged was INR 1000 thus, exemption sought was not available.
SC held that neither is there any compulsion to levy development fee nor is collection conditional upon its deposit in government treasury.
CESTAT held that, there should be mens rea to evade payment of service tax for demand of service tax and penalty beyond period of limitation.
Discover the CESTAT, Chennai ruling on Service Tax liability for liquidated damages. Explore the case of M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited and understand why recovery of damages is not considered a taxable service. Stay informed on GST implications with insights from circular no. 178/10/2022-GST.
HC directs AO to provide effective cross-examination opportunity in accordance with provisions of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and permit petitioner to cross- examine without in any manner interfering or restricting.
Projects executed prior to June 01, 2007, which were in the nature of composite works contract, could not be brought within the fold of commercial or industrial construction service or CC services and for the period post June 01, 2007, the liability to pay Service Tax could be fastened under CC services only if the activities were in the nature of service simpliciter.
Explore the legal perspective on property transfer in a BOO contract. Learn how the Kerala High Court ruled on the taxation of fixed costs in the case of Prodair Air Products India Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala, clarifying that payment of fixed costs does not necessarily imply a transfer of property.
HC held that, cancellation of registration effected on ground of non-filing of GST return, could be revoked and assessee can claim ITC
