Read about Kerala High Court’s verdict in EVM Passenger Cars India Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Kerala, highlighting importance of GST document compliance during goods transportation.
Delhi High Court, in Rahul Kumar Jain and Co. v. Union Of India & Anr., held that GST Registration cannot be cancelled without specific reasons and has imposed a cost of INR 5,000 on Revenue Department.
CESTAT Ahmedabad sets aside service tax demand on electrification services, ruling they do not qualify as works contract services. Read detailed case analysis.
In Lyka Labs Ltd. vs. C.C.E. & S.T., CESTAT Ahmedabad addresses the classification of Ayurvedic medicaments with non-active ingredients, setting legal precedence.
CESTAT Chandigarh quashes denial of Cenvat Credit on input, input services, capital goods for Tower Vision India Pvt Ltd. Analysis of the ruling.
Explore the Kerala High Court’s judgment in Diya Agencies vs. State Tax Officer, highlighting that denying input tax credit based solely on GSTR-2A is unjust.
CESTAT set aside demand order passed by Adjudicating Authority and held that, marketing, sales promotion, and technical pre-sales support service provided by assessee to Indian customer on direction of foreign company tantamount to ‘export of service’.
Delhi High Court denies anticipatory bail to a CA accused of forgery and GST evasion through false invoices from non-existent entities.
Patna High Court ruling on the constitutional validity of CGST/BGST Act Section 16(4) and its impact on Input Tax Credit (ITC) explained.
Analysis of Bombay High Court’s decision on State Tax Officer’s jurisdiction to issue provisional attachment notices under Section 83 of MGST Act
