Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Diya Agencies Vs State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)
Appeal Number : WP(C) No. 29769 of 2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/09/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Diya Agencies Vs State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court)

ITC cannot be denied to the recipient solely on the ground that transaction not reflected in GSTR-2A 

The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in Diya Agencies v. The State Tax Officer [WP(C) No. 29769 of 2023 dated September 12, 2023] held that, if the taxpayer is able to prove that tax amount is paid to the seller and the Input Tax Credit claim is bonafide so the Input Tax Credit cannot be d

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Parameswaran TK says:

    It has to be proved that seller uploaded invoice document in GSTR1 but it did not appear in GSTR2A due to technical glitches. Otherwise the seller should be booked for tax evasion. Unfortunately there is no system for the buyer to report the GST officials about the non filing of invoice by seller . it so happens that seller filed GSTR1 only after due date so that it will appear only in the GSTR 2A of succeeding month. in such a case the buyer can claim ITC in next month.. In this particular case it is not clear whether non filing or late filing is responsible for the particular incident

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31