B K Sales Corporation (Appellant) was appointed as consignment agent by way of an Agreement by Narmada Chematur Petrochemicals Ltd. (principal). In terms of the Agreement, the principal was required to supply their product duly packed in drums on regular basis to the Appellant
The CBEC has issued an instructions vide letter F. No. 296/185/2014-CX.9 dated September 30, 2014 to all CCs and DGs on its action plan to evolve Non-adversarial indirect tax administration for the benefit of trade, industry and other stakeholders, whereby certain initiatives are being undertaken as follows: Punctuality: Officers are advised to maintain the appointed […]
The Hon’ble Tribunal in absence of any discussion with regard to mala fide intention and mens rea set aside the OIO to the extent it related to imposition of penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act.
The Department received an anonymous complainant indicating therein that during the period February 9, 1993 to September 27, 1995 about 3839.350 MT ordinary Portland cement was illegally sold which involved Excise Duty amounting to Rs.7,20,154/-, by using parallel documents like GP1s, invoices, challans , Bills, cash memo and GRs, etc.
In the instant case, General Export Enterprises (Appellant) had exported consignment of manmade fabrics. During the course of the investigation, the gram per square meter (GSM) values declared by the Appellant were found to be misdeclared but the goods were allowed to be exported
The Hon’ble Madras High Court observed that the Petitioner was granted a time period of 8 years to fulfil the export obligations. However, the Department had initiated the proceedings before the expiry of stipulated period of 8 years. Therefore, the Hon’ble High Court held that initiation of proceedings in such a case was completely arbitrary and faulty.
The Cenvat Credit on plastic crates were used for safe transportation of finished goods is allowable even it is not being used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products CCE, Noida Vs. Denso India Ltd. & Another [2014 (9) TMI 635 – Allahabad High Court] Denso India Ltd. & Another (the Respondent) […]
Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-II Vs. Mishal Zinc Industries Pvt. Ltd. and Indo Deutsh Metallo Chemique Ltd. [2014-TIOL1 725-CESTAT-MUM] The Respondents are manufacturer of White Zinc Oxide and having two units (a) Mishal Zinc Industries Pvt. Ltd (the Unit 1) and (b) Indo Deutsch Metallo Chimique Ltd (the Unit 2) [the Respondents]. Till August 1998, […]
The Central Board of Excise and Customs has issued an instruction F. No. 6/8/2014- CX.1 dated September 17, 2014 in terms of the judgment of the Apex Court in case of Super Synotex India Ltd. [2014-TIOL-19-SCCX] on the issue of abatement of Sales Tax under an abatement scheme where the Assesse has been allowed to […]
In the instant case, Essar Projects Ltd. (Essar) sold the entire business pertaining to their ‘Construction Division’ to Essar Construction (I) Ltd. (the New Company), w.e.f. June 30, 2006 as per ‘Business Transfer Agreement’. The Department contended that amount received by the New Company on account of the services rendered post June 30, 2006, though the entire Service tax liability pertaining to these services had already been discharged by Essar, the New Company is liable to pay Service tax on same. The Department issued Show Cause Notice to the New Company and the demand was confirmed by the Adjudicating authority.
