This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Double Deduction: ITAT Allows Separate Claims for Bad Debts – Sections 36(1)(vii) & 36(1)(viia)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Small Industries Development Bank of India (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Small Industries Development Bank of India (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT: No duplication or excessive bad debts deduction claim, allows deduction under both Secs. 36(1)(vii) & 36(1)(viia)
Summary: ITAT Mumbai upheld relief to the assessee, a statutory financial institution, on multiple issues relating to bad debt and special reserve deductions. It ruled that deductions under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia)(c) operate independently, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. CIT, and that the proviso to Section 36(1)(vii) prevents only double deduction, w...
Author Info
