Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Small Industries Development Bank of India (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Small Industries Development Bank of India (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT: No duplication or excessive bad debts deduction claim, allows deduction under both Secs. 36(1)(vii) & 36(1)(viia) Summary: ITAT Mumbai upheld relief to the assessee, a statutory financial institution, on multiple issues relating to bad debt and special reserve deductions. It ruled that deductions under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia)(c) operate independently, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. CIT, and that the proviso to Section 36(1)(vii) prevents only double deduction, w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am Delhi Delhi-based advocate specializing in tax litigation and advisory, especially to corporates. I represent taxpayers at all tax tribunals and High Courts. we also undertake advisory in Mergers and Acquisitions matters. My contact details are vgrmc2018@gmail.com. 9811728992. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Fantasy Sports Liable to GST as Skill Element Does Not Remove Uncertainty in Outcome: SC ALP Cannot Be Determined at Nil Without Comparable Analysis: ITAT Ahmedabad No Provision to Replace Actual Land Cost with Market Value for Section 80-IB(10) Deduction: ITAT Chennai ITAT Delhi Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition as Sales Were Recorded ITAT Quashes Section 143(1) Adjustment as No Prior Notice Issued View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930