Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Narayana Rao Hebri Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Narayana Rao Hebri Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee, a real estate businessman, was subjected to a survey u/s 133A on 27.09.2016, during which he voluntarily offered ₹1,14,20,100 as additional income to “cover up omissions & accounting errors.” He later filed his return including this amount & paid regular tax. The assessment was selected for limited scrutiny only to verify “payment of tax in cash during demonetization.” During demonetization, Assessee had paid ₹24 lakh income tax in cash, & explained that the source was cash withdrawn (₹28.30 lakh) from bank + rent ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930