Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nasser Aziz Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-2008
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nasser Aziz Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) When Revenue Assumes & Not Proves, ITAT Removes – High-Pitched Additions Without Evidence?- ITAT Says Absolutely Not- Search Gave Jurisdiction, But Facts Gave Victory – ITAT Sides with Assessee on Merits This case arose out of a search conducted on Assessee &  its group, leading to assessments under section 153A. The Assessing Officer made several additions alleging unexplained investments &  on-money payments based primarily on loose sheets &  statements of third parties. Assessee challenged these additions before  CIT(A) , who ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930