Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tejas Ghanshyambhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tejas Ghanshyambhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee, a proprietor who sold an immovable property as co-owner & received ₹1.8 Cr (30% share), claimed deduction u/s 54EC (₹50L) & u/s 54F (₹36.27L). The return was filed belatedly (24-03-2017) & revised belatedly. AO denied both deductions & added ₹86.27L, thereafter levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars. In quantum appeal, CIT(A) accepted that the investments were mostly within the allowed timeline (till 31-07-2016) & directed AO to proportionately allow deduction u/s 54EC/54F. Thus,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930