Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Baba Vishwakarma Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Baba Vishwakarma Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi restores ₹2.35 Cr loan addition for fresh examination – CIT(A) deleted addition based on additional evidence without giving AO proper opportunity Assessee company faced a best judgment assessment u/s 144 because it did not respond to multiple notices. AO treated ₹2,35,50,000 of unsecured loans as unexplained cash credits u/s 68 and added the entire amount. Assessee then went to CIT(A), produced fresh documentary evidence including confirmations, sale deed of the lender (Mrs. Savita Kamboj), and bank & financial ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031