Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lotus Footwear Enterprises Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : : 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Lotus Footwear Enterprises Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) Fresh Capital, Not Splitting: Employee Transfers No Bar- ITAT Chennai Allows 100% SEZ Deduction u/s 10AA Lotus Footwear Enterprises Ltd., India Branch (a BVI company branch) operates two SEZ units (LU1 & LU2) in SIPCOT Industrial Park, Tamil Nadu, manufacturing NIKE footwear. LU1 commenced in 2008 & LU2 in April 2014 after SEZ approval with investment exceeding ₹76 Cr. AO restricted deduction claimed u/s 10AA for LU2 to 50% (instead of 100%) holding LU2 was formed by splitting up of LU1, transferring employees & machinery,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930