Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Fresh SEZ Unit with New Capital Eligible for 100% Deduction u/s 10AA: ITAT Chennai

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 8769
Case Name
Lotus Footwear Enterprises Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20
Advertisement

Lotus Footwear Enterprises Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)

Fresh Capital, Not Splitting: Employee Transfers No Bar- ITAT Chennai Allows 100% SEZ Deduction u/s 10AA

Lotus Footwear Enterprises Ltd., India Branch (a BVI company branch) operates two SEZ units (LU1 & LU2) in SIPCOT Industrial Park, Tamil Nadu, manufacturing NIKE footwear. LU1 commenced in 2008 & LU2 in April 2014 after SEZ approval with investment exceeding ₹76 Cr.

AO restricted deduction claimed u/s 10AA for LU2 to 50% (instead of 100%) holding LU2 was formed by splitting up of LU1, transferring employees & machinery, producing same products, & being interdependent. AO also denied deduction prior to set-off of losses & unabsorbed depreciation. CIT(A)/ DRP upheld this.

Tribunal noted earlier order (20.11.2024) had rejected 100% claim citing >20% used machinery transfer but had ignored assessee’s evidence on CWIP & other grounds. On Miscellaneous Application, order was recalled for fresh adjudication.

On merits, Tribunal examined detailed submissions:

  • LU2 was separately approved as new SEZ unit, with fresh capital outlay, independent premises & departments.
  • Transfer of some employees is commercially permissible & not a statutory bar; SEZ instruction No.70 allows manpower transfers.
  • Turnover & profits of LU1 increased even after LU2 started, showing no splitting/reconstruction.
  • Inclusion of CWIP/new machinery reduced used machinery ratio below 20%, satisfying sec.10AA(4)(iii).
  • Producing same “Young Athlete” shoes initially by LU2 was only due to skill building of new workers; later LU1 focused on complex models with higher profits.

Tribunal, relying on SC in Sociedade de Fomento Industrial (443 ITR 34) & Delhi HC in Macquarie Global Services, held LU2 was a new undertaking & not formed by splitting/reconstruction. Accordingly, 100% deduction u/s 10AA for LU2 was allowed. Tribunal also clarified that deduction u/s 10AA should be computed before setting off brought forward losses & depreciation, following earlier ITAT rulings. Appeals of Assessee were allowed, granting full relief for AYs 2016-17 to 2019-20.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,289

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.