Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Divyang Dipakkumar Vyas Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Divyang Dipakkumar Vyas Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Loose Papers Without Party/Property Details Not Enough for Taxing Brokerage- Rough Jottings Cannot Justify Addition of Rs. 20.3 Lakh Brokerage Income Assessee, partner in City Estate Group with Shri Pravin Bavadiya (profit ratio 20:80), had originally declared income of Rs.6.65 lakh. AO, relying on seized loose papers, alleged unaccounted brokerage income of Rs.84 lakh and taxed Rs.20.30 lakh as Assessee’s 20% share for A.Y. 2019-20. Similar additions were made for subsequent years. CIT(A) upheld additions, holding that brokerage was received ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930