Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Charging Interest in Microfinance Doesn’t Kill Charitable Status: ITAT Delhi

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 8031
Case Name
Humana People to People India Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement

Humana People to People India Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi Holds Microfinance as Charitable – Charging Interest Doesn’t Kill Charitable Nature – ITAT Backs NGO’s Livelihood Work

Background

  • Assessee: Humana People to People India (HPPI), a not-for-profit company registered u/s 25 of Companies Act & u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act.
  • Activities: Education, relief to poor, medical relief, environment & microfinance (since 2007).
  • AO’s Findings (29.12.2019 u/s 143(3)):
    • Noted income from commission, processing fee, interest, and microfinance exceeded 20% of total receipts.
    • Applied proviso to s.2(15), held microfinance activity commercial.
    • Treated specified grants of ₹31.71 Cr as income.
    • Assessed taxable income at ₹5.43 Cr, denied exemption u/s 11.
  • CIT(A)/NFAC (30.09.2024): Upheld AO’s order, treated assessee as AOP, confirmed denial of exemption.

Tribunal’s Findings

1. Charitable Nature of Microfinance

  • Microfinance started in 2007 to provide credit to rural poor women.
  • Tribunal noted:
    • Earlier years’ assessments consistently accepted microfinance as charitable.
    • RBI circulars allow NGOs to act as business correspondents; income incidental to livelihood support.
  • Cited precedents:
    • Spandana (Rural & Urban Development Organization) (AP HC, 2013).
    • Navodaya Grama Vikas Charitable Trust (ITAT Bangalore, 2023).
    • Janodaya Trust (ITAT Bangalore, 2016).
    • Adhikar, Bhubaneshwar (ITAT Cuttack, 2018).
  • Held: Charging 14–26% effective interest to cover costs does not make activity commercial.

2. Specified Grants

  • AO wrongly treated earmarked grants (₹31.71 Cr) as income.
  • Tribunal relied on DIT vs. Society for Development Alternatives (Del HC, 2012):
  • Specified grants are liabilities, not voluntary contributions, as they must be used only for earmarked purposes.

3. Application of Proviso to Section 2(15)

  • AO’s reliance on Circular 11/2008 misplaced.
  • Tribunal: Assessee engaged in relief of poor, education & livelihood support.
  • Microfinance subserves main charitable objects; not business or trade.

Decision

  • Exemption u/s 11 & 12 restored.
  • Additions of ₹5.43 Cr deleted.
  • Both orders of AO (29.12.2019) & CIT(A) (30.09.2024) set aside.
  • Appeal allowed in full

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,911

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.