Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Umakant Agrawal Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Umakant Agrawal Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹1 Crore Section 68 Addition – Loan from Alleged “Hawala Operator” Found Genuine- Hawala Tag Alone Insufficient – Generic Investigation Report Not Enough- Loan with Banking Trail & TDS Found Genuine Facts   Assessee engaged in trading & commission business. ROI filed (30.09.2011) declaring income ₹2.09 Cr. Case reopened u/s 147 based on Investigation Wing report that creditor Rajendra Drolia (M/s Sai Traders) was a hawala operator giving accommodation entries. AO held ₹1 Cr unsecured loan received (March 2011) wa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031