Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Seema Goel Vs CIT(Appeals) (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Seema Goel Vs CIT(Appeals) (ITAT Delhi) Inadvertent Error in Form 35 to seek condonation Can’t Kill Appeal -30-Day Delay Not Fatal – ITAT Delhi Sends Appeal Back for Fresh Hearing The grievance of Assessee was that CIT(A) dismissed her appeal on the ground that there was a delay of 30 days in filing Form 35 & no explanation for condonation was filed. Assessee submitted that in Form 35, by inadvertent mistake, she had ticked “No” in the column for delay though in fact there was a short delay of 30 days. CIT(A) did not provide her any opportunity to explain the reasons for delay &...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930