Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M.B. Patil Constructions Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
M.B. Patil Constructions Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) 80-IA deduction remanded for fresh verification; Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) sent back in light of SC’s Gopal & Sons; Partial Relief on Agri Income & Ad-hoc Expenses – Appeals Partly Allowed Assessee engaged in civil & infrastructure development contracts, filed its return declaring income of ₹1.51 crore for A.Y. 2013-14. The case was scrutinized, & AO framed assessment u/s 143(3) determining total income at ₹54.83 crore. Major additions included disallowance u/s 40A(3), disallowance of agricultural income, ad-hoc disallowan...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930