This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mere deduction disallowance not attracts Section 271(1)(c) Penalty: Madras HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs The Cuddalore District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
CIT Vs The Cuddalore District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd (Madras High Court)
The substantial question of law framed by the Madras High Court was whether penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be levied on the assessee, even though Assessee had claimed deductions u/s 36(1)(viia) among others which were not applicable to co-operative banks.
Assessee, a co-operative bank, had claimed deductions u/s 36(1)(viia), among others. AO imposed a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. CIT(A) deleted the penalty & the ITAT upheld the deletion. Revenue appealed to the High C...





