Case Law Details
Case Name : Royal Enfield Motors Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Royal Enfield Motors Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai held that refund claim filed beyond statutory time limit of 6 months stipulated under section 104 of the Finance Act, 1994 is liable to be rejected. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee dismissed.
Facts- The appellant had filed a refund claim for an amount of Rs.1,79,46,788/- on 31.10.2017 claiming that the said amount was erroneously collected as service tax by SIPCOT on developmental charges. On verification, it was observed that service tax paid on developmental charges during the period from 1.6...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

