Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Royal Enfield Motors Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Royal Enfield Motors Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) CESTAT Chennai held that refund claim filed beyond statutory time limit of 6 months stipulated under section 104 of the Finance Act, 1994 is liable to be rejected. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee dismissed. Facts- The appellant had filed a refund claim for an amount of Rs.1,79,46,788/- on 31.10.2017 claiming that the said amount was erroneously collected as service tax by SIPCOT on developmental charges. On verification, it was observed that service tax paid on developmental charges during the period from 1.6...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930