This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Rebate claim rejection not justified as cenvat credit not lapsed in terms of rule 11(3)(i) of CCR, 2004
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Valli Textile Mills (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 03/03/2025
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Valli Textile Mills (Madras High Court)
Madras High Court dismissed the writ appeals and held that rejection of rebate claim by taking stand that cenvat credit has lapsed in view of rule 11(3)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 [CCR 2004] is not tenable.
Facts- The writ petitioner is a company engaged in manufacture of cotton yarn, cotton fabrics and knitted fabrics falling under Chapter 52 and 60 of Central Excise Tariff and polyester cotton blended knitted fabrics falling under Chapter 60. They have been clearing the same for home...
Author Info
