Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shah Maganlal Gulabchand Choksi Vs ACIT (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shah Maganlal Gulabchand Choksi Vs ACIT (ITAT Surat) Conclusion: Peak credit theory could not be applied when cash deposits were converted into cheque/RTGS withdrawals, especially when there was an indication of converting undisclosed income. The importance of following the SOP and guidelines issued by CBDT for handling demonetization cases, ensuring consistency and fairness in assessments. AO must conduct thorough verification and consider all evidence, including explanations provided by the assessee, before making additions for unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A and 68. Held: Assessee was eng...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930