This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Stay Application cannot be denied solely for non-deposit of 20% of disputed Tax
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Maa Danateshwari Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes Through Its Chairman (Chhattisgarh High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Maa Danateshwari Vs Central Board of Direct Taxes Through Its Chairman (Chhattisgarh High Court)
Chhattisgarh High Court set aside an order requiring Maa Danateshwari to deposit 20% of the outstanding tax amount during the pendency of an appeal. The petitioner had challenged the assessment order, arguing that the tax demand arose due to the non-availability of PAN cards of marginal maize farmers. While the appeal was pending before the tax authorities, the petitioner sought a stay on the demand, which was denied solely on the ground of non-deposit of 20% of the disputed amount. The petitioner ...
