Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Diebold Nixdorf India Private Limited Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Diebold Nixdorf India Private Limited Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that as per section 36(1)(va) delayed payment of PF & ESIC has to be treated as income of the assessee. Hence, alternate claim of deduction of the same u/s. 37(1) of the Act is not acceptable. Facts- During assessment proceedings, AO noticed that payment towards employees contribution to PF & ESIC was not made within due date and hence the same was liable to be disallowed. First Appellate Authority sustained the same. However, assessee has made alternate deduction of the same under section 37 of the Income Tax ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930