Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Addition u/s. 2(22)(e) untenable as trade advances cannot be characterized as loans or advance

Case Law Details

Case Name
MSN Pharmachem Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2019-20 & 2020-21
Advertisement
MSN Pharmachem Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad held that trade advances, in the nature of commercial transactions, cannot be characterized as ‘loans or advance’ constituting deemed dividend within the meaning of section 2(22)(e). Thus, addition towards deemed dividend untenable. Facts- The appellant company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of drugs and pharmaceuticals. Post search operation, the case was selected for scrutiny and the assessment was completed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for assessment year 2019-20 on 03-04...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *