The legal landscape regarding Tax Authorities’ power and justification for arrests of assesse/tax payers under the Customs Act, 1962, and the Central Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act, 2017, has evolved significantly, particularly following landmark judgments by the Supreme Court of India. This article aims to elucidate the key aspects of the legal framework governing arrests under these acts, the implications of recent amendments, and the safeguards in place to protect individual rights.
Legal Background
Om Prakash Case: The Supreme Court’s decision in Om Prakash and Another v. Union of India {WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.66 OF 2011} established that offences under the Customs Act were non-cognizable and bailable, requiring a warrant for arrest. This ruling emphasized the need for judicial oversight in the arrest process.
Amendments to the Customs Act: Subsequent amendments in 2012, 2013, and 2019 redefined certain offences as cognizable and non-bailable, allowing customs officers to arrest without a warrant under specific conditions.
Key Provisions of the Customs Act
Cognizable Offences: Under Section 104(4) of the Customs Act, certain offences are classified as cognizable, meaning customs officers can arrest individuals without a warrant if they have reasonable grounds to believe that a specified offense has been committed. These offences include those related to prohibited good (such as drugs)s; evasion of customs duty exceeding fifty lakh rupees; importing or exporting goods that have not been declared according to the law, where the market price exceeds one crore rupees; and fraudulently availing or attempting to avail a drawback or exemption from duty if the amount exceeds fifty lakh rupees. This means that customs officers can arrest individuals without a warrant if they have reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been committed.
Non-Cognizable Offences: All other offences under the Customs Act remain non-cognizable and bailable, requiring a warrant for arrest.
Legal Safeguards
Judicial Oversight: The Supreme Court has emphasized the importance of judicial oversight in the arrest process. Officers must have “reasons to believe” based on credible material before making an arrest.
Grounds for Arrest: Section 104(1) mandates that the grounds for arrest must be communicated to the arrestee as soon as possible, ensuring transparency and accountability.
Rights of the Arrestee: The arrested individual has the right to consult a legal practitioner and must be informed of the grounds for arrest, as stipulated under Article 22 of the Constitution of India.
Section 69 of the CGST Act: Section 69 of the CGST Act gives the GST Commissioner the power to arrest people suspected of committing certain tax evasion crimes, similar to the powers under the Customs Act. Before making an arrest, the Commissioner must have good reasons to believe that a crime has been committed.
Most offences under this Act are considered non-cognizable and bailable, meaning they are less serious and the accused can get bail. However, some offences considered serious in nature, like those involving tax evasion by way of not issuing invoices or using fake invoices, are considered cognizable and non-bailable, meaning they are more serious and the accused cannot get bail easily. Additionally, a person shall not be prosecuted for any offence under this section except with the previous sanction of the Commissioner.
Key offences under Section 132 of CGST Act, include:
Supply without Invoice: Evading tax by not issuing invoices.
Issuing False Invoices: Creating invoices without actual supply, leading to wrongful input tax credit.
Wrongful Input Tax Credit: Claiming credit using false invoices.
Tax Collection and Non-Payment: Failing to pay collected tax to the government within three months.
Bailable and Non-Bailable Offences: The GST Act classifies offences as bailable or non-bailable based on the amount of tax evaded, with stringent conditions for non-bailable offences.
Judicial Review and Individual Rights
Judicial Review: The Supreme Court has clarified that while the power of judicial review is broad, it should be exercised cautiously in cases involving arrests under special acts. Courts will primarily assess whether statutory safeguards have been followed rather than the adequacy of evidence.
Protection of Individual Liberty: The courts have reiterated that the power to arrest should not be exercised arbitrarily. The rights of individuals must be balanced against the need for effective law enforcement.
Conclusion
The legal framework governing arrests under the Customs Act and GST Act reflects a delicate balance between enforcing tax laws and protecting individual rights. Recent amendments and judicial interpretations have reinforced the need for accountability and transparency in the arrest process. As the legal landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial for both law enforcement agencies and individuals to understand their rights and responsibilities under these laws. The on-going dialogue between legislative intent and judicial oversight will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of tax enforcement in India.
Author Bio
