This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Deduction u/s. 36(1)(viia) is distinct from deduction u/s. 36(1)(viia): Bombay HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Industrial Development Bank of India Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 1993-94
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Industrial Development Bank of India Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court held that the deduction on account of provision for bad and doubtful debts u/s. 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act is distinct and independent of the provisions of section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act relating to allowance of the bad debts.
Facts- The appellant is a Scheduled Commercial Bank, which has rural branches as defined in clause (ia) of Explanation to Section 36(1) (viia) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee follows the practice of writing off in its books of accounts, bad debts during the course of t...
Author Info
