Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aravindan Vedhavaththiyar Singarachari Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17 & 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Aravindan Vedhavaththiyar Singarachari Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) In the case of Aravindan Vedhavaththiyar Singarachari vs. DCIT, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore addressed the importance of issuing a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act for a valid assessment. The assessee’s returns for the assessment years 2016-17 and 2018-19 were reopened due to discrepancies in declared capital gains from property sales. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a notice under Section 148, assuming jurisdiction, but failed to issue the required notice under Section 143(2). The as...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930