Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aravindan Vedhavaththiyar Singarachari Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17 & 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Aravindan Vedhavaththiyar Singarachari Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)

In the case of Aravindan Vedhavaththiyar Singarachari vs. DCIT, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore addressed the importance of issuing a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act for a valid assessment. The assessee’s returns for the assessment years 2016-17 and 2018-19 were reopened due to discrepancies in declared capital gains from property sales. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a notice under Section 148, assuming jurisdiction, but failed to issue the required notice under Section 14

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31