Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Lions Seat Cushions Private Limited (GST AAAR Tamil Nadu)
Appeal Number : Order in Appeal No. AAAR/01/2024 (AR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/01/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Lions Seat Cushions Private Limited (GST AAAR Tamil Nadu)

Introduction: In a recent ruling by the Authority for Appellate Advance Ruling, Tamil Nadu, Lions Seat Cushions Private Limited filed an appeal under Section 100(1) of the Tamil Nadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017. The appeal contested the decision of the Tamil Nadu State Authority for Advance Ruling on the classification and applicable rate of tax on seat covers manufactured by the appellant. Additionally, the appellant sought condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to medical reasons affecting its managing director.

Detailed Analysis: The appellant, Lions Seat Cushions Private Limited, contested the ruling of the Authority for Advance Ruling, which classified two-wheeler seat covers under CTH 87149990, attracting GST at 28%. The appellant argued that seat covers should be classified under a specific entry, 94019900, which attracts a lower GST rate of 18%. However, apart from the merits of the case, the appellant sought condonation of delay in filing the appeal beyond the prescribed time limit of 30 days from the passing of the original ruling.

During the personal hearing, the managing director of the appellant company and their authorized representative presented their case, highlighting the medical condition of the managing director, who had undergone heart surgery and was advised complete rest due to chest pain. The medical certificate provided further substantiated the claim of a medical condition preventing timely filing of the appeal.

Conclusion: The Authority for Appellate Advance Ruling, Tamil Nadu, after considering all material and submissions, condoned the delay of 21 days in filing the appeal, citing sufficient cause as per the proviso to Section 100(2) of the CGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the appeal will now be taken up for consideration on its merits. This ruling highlights the importance of providing substantial evidence and demonstrating sufficient cause when seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings under GST laws.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031