Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dulichand Kundanmal Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 05/Kol/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/06/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Dulichand Kundanmal Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata)

In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Kolkata bench has made a pivotal decision regarding the net profit rate applied to Dulichand Kundanmal for the assessment year 2014-15. The tribunal found the 8% net profit rate applied by the Assessing Officer (AO) to be excessive and revised it to 0.50%, marking a substantial decrease and setting a precedent for the application of fair and reasonable profit rates in tax assessments.

The case came into the spotlight due to the appellant, Dulichand Kundanmal, challenging the ex-parte order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax Appeals (CIT(A)), NFAC, Delhi. The primary contention was the arbitrary estimation of net profit by the AO without rejecting the books of accounts, alongside issues of denial of proper hearing opportunities and the absence of a detailed speaking order from the CIT(A).

The ITAT meticulously analyzed the appellant’s history of declared profits, which were significantly lower in the preceding years, accepted by the AO. Considering this and the audited financial statements, the ITAT deduced that the net profit rate of 0.50% declared by the appellant for the year in question was reasonable. This decision was underpinned by judicial precedents favoring the average of three years’ profit rates as a basis for estimation.

The ITAT Kolkata’s decision to revise the net profit rate to 0.50% from the initially applied 8% by the AO is a testament to the tribunal’s commitment to ensuring equitable and justified tax assessments. This ruling not only benefits Dulichand Kundanmal by reducing its taxable income significantly but also sets a benchmark for future cases where profit rates are estimated without substantial reasons. The tribunal’s approach highlights the importance of fair play in tax administration and the need for authorities to consider an assessee’s historical financial performance and compliance history before making arbitrary adjustments. 

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031