Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Roli Enterprises Vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Tax No. 937 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/01/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Roli Enterprises Vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others (Allahabad High Court)

The Allahabad High Court has recently delivered a judgment in the case of Roli Enterprises vs. State of U.P. and Others, where the petitioner challenged a penalty levied under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The penalty was imposed for the non-completion of Part ‘B’ of the e-Way Bill.

The crux of the matter revolves around the petitioner’s failure to fill Part ‘B’ of the e-Way Bill. The undisputed facts highlight that the bilty contained details of the truck carrying the goods, the goods matched the invoice, and there was no indication of any intention by the petitioner to evade tax.

Mr. Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner, cited relevant judgments, including VSL Alloys (India) Pvt. Ltd v. State of U.P. and M/s Citykar Retail Private Limited, to argue that the mere non-completion of Part ‘B’ without any intent to evade tax should not lead to the imposition of a penalty under Section 129(3) of the Act.

On the other hand, Sri Rishi Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, relied on the appellate authority’s order that confirmed the non-completion of Part ‘B’ of the e-Way Bill.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031