Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Clandestine removal allegation based on certain statements untenable as cross-examination denied

Case Law Details

Case Name
Manoj Maheshwari Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Manoj Maheshwari Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Mumbai held that witnesses relied upon by the central excise authorities are not acceptable evidence in the absence of cross-examination that was denied. Hence, matter alleging clandestine removal mainly resting upon certain statements is remanded back to enable cross-examination. Facts- Shortage of finished products and inputs on which CENVAT credit had been availed were noticed during visit of officers of central excise which was regularized promptly by discharge of differential duty and reversal of credit. That was al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *