Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manoj Maheshwari Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manoj Maheshwari Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Mumbai held that witnesses relied upon by the central excise authorities are not acceptable evidence in the absence of cross-examination that was denied. Hence, matter alleging clandestine removal mainly resting upon certain statements is remanded back to enable cross-examination. Facts- Shortage of finished products and inputs on which CENVAT credit had been availed were noticed during visit of officers of central excise which was regularized promptly by discharge of differential duty and reversal of credit. That was al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930