Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commr. of Cen. Exc. Ahmedabad Vs Urmin Products P. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commr. of Cen. Exc. Ahmedabad Vs Urmin Products P. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) Supreme Court held that Notification No. 2 of 2006 dated 01.03.2006 didn’t specify the goods falling under CET SH 2403 9930, i.e., ‘zarda/jarda scented tobacco’, but it covers the goods falling under CET SH 2403 9910 i.e., ‘chewing tobacco’. Thus zarda/jarda scented tobacco not having been specified under MRP­ based assessment under Section 4A of the CE Act, the goods had to be necessarily assessed under Section 4 of the CE Act. Facts- The assessee classified the product manufactured as ‘chewing tobac...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930