Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ASP Ship Management (India) Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 85072 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/08/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ASP Ship Management (India) Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)

CESTAT Mumbai held that demand of service tax on reimbursement of expenditure by the ship owner goes beyond the mandate of Section 67 the Finance Act, 1994. Accordingly, demand of service tax confirmed u/r 5 doesn’t survive as rule 5 itself has been held to be ultra vires of section 67.

Facts- The appellants are engaged in rendering “ship management services” and are registered under service tax. On the basis of investigation, it was concluded that various reimbursable expenses received during October 2006 to March 2011, on which service tax is liable to be paid have not been paid by the appellants. Accordingly, show cause proceedings were initiated. Commissioner had confirmed the adjudged demands besides the imposition of penalty u/s. 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Conclusion- Held that the demand for service tax on reimbursement expenses goes beyond the mandate of Section 67, which is a charging section for levy of service tax. Section 67, both before and after the 01.05.2006 amendment authorises the determination of the value of the taxable service to charge service tax under Section 66 as the gross amount charged by the service provider for such service provided or to be provided by him, in a case where the consideration for the service is money. The underlined words i.e. “for such service” are important in the setting of Sections 66 and 67. The charge of service tax under Section 66 is on the value of taxable services. The taxable services are listed in Section 65(105). The service provided by the petitioner falls under clause (zzzt).

Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India held that what is brought to charge under the relevant Sections is only the consideration for the taxable service; thus by including the expenditure and costs, Rule 5(1) goes far beyond the charging provisions and cannot be upheld.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031