This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CESTAT clarifies Limitation period & Assessee & Officer Roles in ST 3 Return Scrutiny
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- GD Goenka Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
GD Goenka Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax (CESTAT Delhi)
Introduction: The CESTAT Delhi recently pronounced a judgement in the case of GD Goenka Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax. The matter was represented by Adv Pawan Arora from Athena Law Associates, Delhi. This article delves into the crux of the decision.
Key Points of the Judgement:
1. Filing ST 3 Returns: GD Goenka Private Limited, the appellant, correctly filed the ST 3 Returns. In the absence of a specific request from the Central Excise officer, the ap...
