Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ganesh Sawant Vs Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) & Ors. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.(C) 16818/2022 and CM APPL. 53136/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/05/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ganesh Sawant Vs Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) & Ors. (Delhi High Court)

Delhi High Court held that notice of proceeding under Section 110(1B) of the Customs Act was required to be issued to the owner or the persons from whom the goods were seized.

Facts- The officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) had stopped the petitioner’s car on NH-24. The said vehicle was searched and five gold bars weighing 1000 grams each were found. The said goods were seized by the said officers u/s. 110 of the Customs Act.

Subsequently, the respondents returned four gold bars, which were seized. The controversy, thus, relates to a single gold bar of 1000 grams, which continued to be retained by the concerned authorities.

Proceedings u/s. 110(1D) of the Customs Act were conducted by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) and the seized inventory was certified. Further, the respondents were also granted permission for disposal of the seized gold.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031