This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No bar in cross utilisation of Cenvat credit for payment of Central Excise duty or service tax
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Lupin Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Tax & Respondent Customs (CESTAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Lupin Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Tax & Customs (Appeal) (CESTAT Hyderabad)
HC held that the appellant have rightly taken credit in view of Rule 2(l) of CCR which entitles a manufacturer to claim Cenvat credit on input services utilise in manufacture of dutiable taxable goods.
HC further hold that there is no bar in cross utilisation of Cenvat credit once taken, either for payment of Central Excise duty or service tax, in view of the provisions of Rule 3 or 4 of CCR.
FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT HYDERABAD ORDER
The issue in this appeal relates to rejection of refund claims. The appella...
