Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhavani Engineering Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 704 & 705/Hyd/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/01/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Bhavani Engineering Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT Hyderabad held that mentioning of firm in 2(3)(b) of the Finance Act, 2018 excludes it from 2(3)(a). Accordingly, in case of firm, surcharge is leviable only when its total income exceeds INR 1 crore and not otherwise.

Facts- Assessee is a partnership firm, carrying the business of generation of solar energy. The returns of income filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20 were processed under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Surcharge at the rate of 10% on the income returned by the assessee was levied. According to the assessee, such a levy of surcharge, excess education cess, interest etc., are erroneous. The request of the assessee for a rectification thereof was rejected.

CIT(A) upheld the levy of surcharge, etc. and dismissed the appeal. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed by the assessee.

Conclusion- The legislative wisdom cannot be doubted in making this clear and distinct treatment of various categories of persons for the purpose of levy of surcharge and one category of person for this treatment cannot be construed to include another category of persons in it.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031