Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rudraksh Detergent And Chemicals Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E.-Kutch (Cestat Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 10389 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/02/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rudraksh Detergent And Chemicals Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E.-Kutch (CESTAT  Ahmedabad)

The issue involved in the present case is that whether the re-credit claimed by the appellant is correct or not in terms of para 2C of area based exemption Notification No. 39/2001- CE dated 31.07.2001. This appeal was filed against the Commissioner (Appeals) order whereby the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) has remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to keep the matter in abeyance till recredit orders are issued by the Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner and then to adjudicate the show cause notice.

CESTAT find force in the argument of learned counsel that the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) instead of remanding the matter to the Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner he could have decided the matter finally at his end. The appellant emphatically argued on the issue of limitation. The learned Commissioner (Appeals) instead of deciding the limitation remanded the matter which in our view is prima facie incorrect. It is the submission of the learned counsel that after holding the entire proceeding pre-mature the learned commissioner remanded the matter instead of deciding finally on this observation itself. We find that considering the facts and circumstance of the present case the learned Commissioner (Appeals) ought not to have remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority particularly when the appellant have raised the ground on limitation. Therefore, we are of the view that the matter should go back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for deciding the appeal before him finally without remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

The issue involved in the present case is that whether the re-credit claimed by the appellant is correct or not in terms of para 2C of area based exemption Notification No. 39/2001- CE dated 31.07.2001. This appeal was filed against the Commissioner (Appeals) order whereby the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) has remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to keep the matter in abeyance till recredit orders are issued by the Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner and then to adjudicate the show cause notice.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031