Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Surendra Babu Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-2011
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Surendra Babu Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad held that benefit of deduction under section 54F not eligible as the assessee owns more than one residential property on the date of transfer of the capital asset other than the new asset acquired. Facts- The Pr. CIT initiated proceedings u/s 263 of the I.T. Act on the ground that AO has allowed the claim of deduction u/s 54F without proper verification of the facts in the wake of assessee’s contention that some of the properties were given on rent and hence commercial in nature. Accordingly, AO asked the assessee to explain as to why ded...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930