This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Amendment to extend time limit for reassessment not applicable when notice was Illegal
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DCIT Vs Anand Pershad Jaiswal (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2000-01
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DCIT Vs Anand Pershad Jaiswal (ITAT Delhi)
Conclusion: Subsequent amendment to section 149, by Finance Act, 2012 which extended limitation for initiation of reassessment proceedings to sixteen years could not be resorted for reopening concluded proceedings and the notice issued under Section 149 was time barred and thus could not have been acted upon. Consequently, the impugned re-assessment order passed in consequence of the illegal notice under Section 148 was a nullity and bad in law.
Held: Assessee was an individual and holding the status of Non-Resident Indian for the previous year rele...




