Case Law Details
Case Name : DCIT Vs Anand Pershad Jaiswal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2000-01
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Anand Pershad Jaiswal (ITAT Delhi)
Conclusion: Subsequent amendment to section 149, by Finance Act, 2012 which extended limitation for initiation of reassessment proceedings to sixteen years could not be resorted for reopening concluded proceedings and the notice issued under Section 149 was time barred and thus could not have been acted upon. Consequently, the impugned re-assessment order passed in consequence of the illegal notice under Section 148 was a nullity and bad in law.
Held: Assessee was an individual and holding the status of Non-Resident Indian for the previous year rele...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

