This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Interference u/s 34 unjustified as arbitral award doesn’t contradict public policy
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd Vs Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation (Orissa High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Orissa High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd Vs Sepco Electric Power Construction Corporation (Orissa High Court)
Provisions of section 34 restricts the scope of interference with the arbitral award on the ground of public policy. Present arbitral award doesn’t contradict public policy hence interference unjustified.
Facts-
The petitioner GMR Kamalanga Energy Limited (GKEL) entered into an agreement with the respondent SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation. Dispute arose between the parties for delay in construction and other technical issues. SEPCO (respondent) invoked the arbitration clause and initia...
Author Info
