Case Law Details
ACIT Vs Assam Bengal Carriers (ITAT Kolkata)
Introduction: The case of ACIT vs. Assam Bengal Carriers, adjudicated by ITAT Kolkata, delves into the intricacies of Section 14A disallowance. The backdrop includes the Supreme Court’s significant ruling in Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs CIT, emphasizing the necessity of apportioning expenditure concerning dividend income.
Detailed Analysis: The Assessing Officer (A.O.) disallowed ₹1,36,02,161 under Section 14A, applying Rule 8D, rejecting the assessee’s claim that strategic investments incurred nominal or no expenditure. The A.O. believed that the complex nature of investment decisions involved costs, especially the interest element due to fund blocking.
The Ld. CIT(A) partially allowed the appeal, excluding strategic investments, relying on earlier decisions and specific details of the dividend-earning shares. The decision was based on the principle that strategic investments, aiming for controlling interests, had an incidental dividend, making them exempt from Section 14A.
However, the ITAT, challenging the Ld. CIT(A)’s decision, referred to the recent judgment in Maxopp Investment Ltd. vs CIT. The Supreme Court held that the purpose of investment isn’t crucial; when dividend income is not taxable, Section 14A applies to apportion expenditure between taxable and non-taxable income. The expenditure related to strategic investments requires proportionate apportionment based on case facts.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
